You'll talk through your experience with an AI screener, then build something real with an assistant beside you. This page covers what happens, what's recorded, and your rights, so nothing on the day is a surprise.

Send your details and a resume. An AI reads it against the role and a recruiter decides what happens next. You get an email receipt.
A conversation about your experience that follows the same plan for every candidate. Type or speak, with a whiteboard or code when a question calls for it.
A real project in a real editor with an AI assistant. The company decides how much the assistant can do, and the editor tells you.

Before you send anything, the form tells you an AI will read your resume and a person will decide. The notice you saw is saved with your application.
You'll see a consent notice, then a practice question that isn't recorded, before the first real one. The screener asks about your work and follows up when an answer is vague. Some questions open a whiteboard or a small code workspace. Try the toggles below.
Monaco, the editor inside VS Code, with a file tree, terminal, output panel and live preview. The project comes set up — React, Next.js, Expo or a Node service — with tests already in place.

The company sets the length, usually 30 to 90 minutes. The clock starts when you consent, not when the invite was sent, so reading this page first costs you nothing.
The company picks one of two modes when it sets up the round, and a badge in the editor shows which one you're in. It stays the same for the whole round: what the assistant can do when you start is what it can do when you finish.
These are the habits the assessment rewards. None of them are tricks.
Look at the tests and the code first. A minute of thinking shows up as time to first prompt.
Tag the files. Say what you expect and what the error is. Specific prompts beat short ones.
Read AI output before moving on. Big blocks accepted and never tested are flagged for a person to look at.
Running tests after accepting a change is verification — the clearest signal there is.
When the AI is wrong, correcting it yourself or with a sharper prompt counts as recovery.
Communication is scored. Explain your trade-offs in the screen and in the round.

No, and it says so up front. The screener is an AI that follows a plan the company approved. A person reads the transcript and decides what happens next.
No. Your answers are treated as answers, not instructions, and the plan and scoring live on the server where nothing you type can reach them. Every score has to cite something you actually said.
Not on its own. The share of AI-written code is one signal among several, read next to how you checked and corrected it. Accepting a large block and shipping it untested is what gets flagged.
That's allowed. But in unguarded rounds the company usually wants to see how you work with it, so ignoring it may leave AI fluency unassessed.
Yes. Focus changes are shown to the interviewer as context, the way they'd notice you reading docs on site. Nothing is automatically held against you.
The invite only works for the address it was sent to. Use that address, or ask the recruiter to send the invite again to one you can use.
A current Chrome, Edge, Firefox or Safari on a laptop, and a microphone if you'd like to speak in the screen. Nothing to install: the project and its tests run in a sandbox we host.